Re: speed up a logical replica setup

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: speed up a logical replica setup
Date: 2024-01-04 12:21:23
Message-ID: CAExHW5tSQjMD6_CzKECz=m5Uzdg8NDRkrawy1Av0vVTtB0c0Cw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:34 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > But what good is having the same publications as primary
> > also on logical replica?
> >
>
> The one use case that comes to my mind is to set up bi-directional
> replication. The publishers want to subscribe to the new subscriber.

Hmm. Looks like another user controlled cleanup.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2024-01-04 12:34:20 Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Previous Message Alexander Lakhin 2024-01-04 12:00:01 Re: Random pg_upgrade test failure on drongo