Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: 2025-04-29 12:01:09
Message-ID: CAExHW5soKc9mhLhroi__yrPD-ymkFbz=e5hyZ34iqjM-cdK9_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Maxim,

On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 1:42 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I moved the topic to the next commitfest.
>

I am reviewing these patches.

I notice that transam/README does not mention multixact except one place in
section "Transaction Emulation during Recovery". I expected it to document
how pg_multixact/members and pg_multixact/offset are used and what is their
layout. It's not the responsibility of this patchset to document it, but it
will be good if we add a section about multixacts in transam/README. It
will make reviews easier.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-04-29 12:21:24 Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()
Previous Message Nisha Moond 2025-04-29 12:00:03 Re: Fix slot synchronization with two_phase decoding enabled