Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query
Date: 2023-10-25 03:40:06
Message-ID: CAExHW5siNFMWqDxUCtfbwT10bvcpKZ0GshNE5z-NjgPTQsHV_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:04 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> While that decision as regards auto_explain has long since been made
> (and there would be work to undo it), I don't believe that we should
> repeat that choice here. I'm -10 on moving this into auto_explain.
>

Right.

> However perhaps there is still an opportunity for moving some of the
> auto_explain code into core so as to enable deduplicating the code.
>

Right. That's what I also think.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-10-25 04:08:59 Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
Previous Message Xiang Gao 2023-10-25 03:38:20 RE: CRC32C Parallel Computation Optimization on ARM