| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits |
| Date: | 2025-12-01 12:35:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5s5YN3rEi1JOEaa-7FPdkAYJv_jG67SO28n-On6FW6KAQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 2:23 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 16:17, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> One more thing,
>> An UPDATE waits for FOR SHARE query to finish, and vice versa. In my
>> experiments I didn't see an UPDATE creating a multi-xact. Why do we
>> have UPDATEs in the load created by the test? Am I missing something?
>
>
> As far as I remember, this was done on purpose to create different
> multixact members statuses randomly.
In that case, better to include that in the comments.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-12-01 12:40:01 | Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2025-12-01 12:33:52 | Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72? |