Em qui., 11 de fev. de 2021 às 01:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > *long* 4 *long int*, *signed long int* -2.147.483.648 a 2.147.483.647
> > Therefore long never be > INT_MAX at Windows 64 bits.
> > Thus lindex is always false in this expression:
> > if (errno != 0 || badp == c || *badp != '\0' || lindex > INT_MAX ||
> lindex
> > < INT_MIN)
>
> At the same time, I think this code could be improved; but the way
> to do that is to use strtoint(), rather than kluging the choice of
> datatype even further.
>
No matter the function used strtol or strtoint, push_path will remain
broken with Windows 64bits.
Or need to correct the expression.
Definitely using long is a bad idea.
regards,
Ranier Vilela