Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2021-06-15 10:57:12
Message-ID: CAEudQAqh6vn8WyL7MFULCOca08ZVEwTsgUFzP_OXvseYC7Uwkw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em seg., 14 de jun. de 2021 às 21:01, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> I took it a step further.
>
> Transactions
>
> HEAD patched
> 10002207 10586781
> 10146167 10388685
> 10048919 10333359
> 10065764,3333333 10436275 3,55021946687555
>
> TPS
> HEAD patched
> 33469,016009 35399,010472
> 33950,624679 34733,252336
> 33639,8429 34578,495043
> 33686,4945293333 34903,5859503333 3,48700968070122
>
> 3,55% Is it worth touch procarray.c for real?
>
> With msvc 64 bits, the asm generated:
> HEAD
> 213.731 bytes procarray.asm
> patched
> 212.035 bytes procarray.asm
>
> Patch attached.
>
Added to next CF (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3169/)

regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-15 11:05:42 Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2021-06-15 10:40:46 Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer not null terminated on (ecpg lib)