From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Felix Lechner <felix(dot)lechner(at)lease-up(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
Date: | 2020-06-27 21:14:21 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQApG4d4MJFehrj1YFvrC-8U7ocMsrDsEF8MDAN2oz=mOJA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 16:40, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
escreveu:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
> >
> > Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
> >
> > I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with
> > OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readline, with another GPL product?
>
> I assume you can use wolfSSL as long as the result is GPL, which is the
> same requirement libreadline causes for Postgres, particularly if
> Postgres is statically linked to libreadline.
>
I don't want to divert the focus from the theread, but this subject has a
controversial potential, in my opinion.
I participated in a speech on another list, where I make contributions (IUP
library: https://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/)
Where a user, upon discovering that two sub-libraries, were GPL licenses,
caused an uproar, bringing the speech to Mr.Stallman himself.
In short, the best thing for the project will be to remove the two GPL
sub-libraries.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-06-27 21:14:56 | Re: pg_bsd_indent compiles bytecode |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-06-27 21:12:57 | Re: pg_bsd_indent compiles bytecode |