From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix array access (src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c) |
Date: | 2025-10-10 16:41:48 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQAoPzpC1tDDGtGO6gsbtn+0orb2PTqyd6qknOV4tXv=VyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi.
Em ter., 12 de nov. de 2024 às 19:13, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
> Em ter., 12 de nov. de 2024 às 16:11, Alvaro Herrera <
> alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> escreveu:
>
>> On 2024-Nov-12, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>>
>> > Per Coverity.
>> >
>> > The function *determineNotNullFlags* has a little oversight.
>> > The struct field *notnull_islocal* is an array.
>> >
>> > I think this is a simple typo.
>> > Fix using array notation access.
>>
>> Yeah, thanks, I had been made aware of this bug. Before fixing I'd like
>> to construct a test case that tickles that code, because it's currently
>> uncovered *shudder*
>>
> Thanks for taking care of this.
>
Ping.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-10-10 17:22:52 | Re: Should we update the random_page_cost default value? |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-10 16:26:08 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |