Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2021-07-16 12:41:41
Message-ID: CAEudQAoPXv6+F88gdBhdcs+tSxPd7hbw3zS-nRTZ6FesHEjb=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em sex., 16 de jul. de 2021 às 09:05, Aleksander Alekseev <
aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> escreveu:

> Hi Rainer,
>
> > Here are the two patches.
> > As suggested, reclassified as refactoring only.
>
> Please don't change the status of the patch on CF application before
> it was reviewed. It will only slow things down.
>
Hi Aleksander,
Sorry, lack of practice.

> Your patch seems to have some problems on FreeBSD. Please see
> http://commitfest.cputube.org/

I saw.
Very strange, in all other architectures, it went well.
I will have to install a FreeBSD to be able to debug.

Thanks for your review.

best regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2021-07-16 13:01:24 Re: Corrected documentation of data type for the logical replication message formats.
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2021-07-16 12:05:19 Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)