Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2021-09-16 11:03:23
Message-ID: CAEudQAoKTNJGSom-5MqxoukQLChEX9NrbEp-Hkds93x5Yf+FOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qui., 16 de set. de 2021 às 01:13, Fujii Masao <
masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> escreveu:

>
>
> On 2021/09/15 21:27, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > I found this in the commit log in the patch. I agree that these
> patches
> > are refactoring ones. But I'm thinking that it's worth doing
> back-patch,
> > to make future back-patching easy. Thought?
> >
> > Thanks for picking this.
>
> Pushed. Thanks!
>
Thank you.

I will close this item if it is not already closed.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2021-09-16 11:45:06 Re: Partial index "microvacuum"
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-16 10:04:45 Re: [BUG] Unexpected action when publishing partition tables