Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date: 2021-09-16 04:13:40
Message-ID: 4289265f-69e9-0edf-914c-cbddfe83d380@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/09/15 21:27, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> I found this in the commit log in the patch. I agree that these patches
> are refactoring ones. But I'm thinking that it's worth doing back-patch,
> to make future back-patching easy. Thought?
>
> Thanks for picking this.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-16 04:24:29 Re: Added schema level support for publication.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-16 04:01:48 Re: improve pg_receivewal code