| From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improving connection scalability (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) |
| Date: | 2022-08-01 23:27:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAEudQAo7a_EP317EGjDPTRW8E_GaUoFFLDWAtARdFKi64KZ8gw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 1 de ago. de 2022 às 18:51, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
escreveu:
> On 5/31/22 11:44, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I'd argue this is either just noise, and there's no actual difference.
> > This could be verified by some sort of statistical testing (e.g. the
> > well known t-test).
>
> Given the conversation so far, I'll go ahead and mark this Returned with
> Feedback. Specifically, this patch would need hard statistical proof
> that it's having a positive effect.
>
I think that the contrary opinions, the little proven benefit and the lack
of enthusiasm in changing procarray.c,
I believe it is best to reject it.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-08-01 23:27:40 | Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2022-08-01 23:24:02 | [PATCH] postgresql.conf.sample comment alignment. |