| From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Avoid unncessary always true test (src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c) |
| Date: | 2024-02-02 11:20:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAEudQAo7aBhBwyB3BhUQJ+wVeJanGFhm+2qBRPaHwwyfbz-b+w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em sex., 2 de fev. de 2024 às 03:48, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
escreveu:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:04:39AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > The patch which you submitted has been awaiting your attention for
> > quite some time now. As such, we have moved it to "Returned with
> > Feedback" and removed it from the reviewing queue. Depending on
> > timing, this may be reversible. Kindly address the feedback you have
> > received, and resubmit the patch to the next CommitFest.
>
> Even with that, it seems to me that this is not required now that
> 21d9c3ee4ef7 outlines better how long SMgrRelation pointers should
> live, no?
>
Correct Micheal, the best thing would be to remove the patch now.
Since it has completely lost its meaning.
Best regards,
Ranier Vilela
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-02-02 11:35:52 | Re: An improvement on parallel DISTINCT |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-02-02 10:39:25 | Re: An improvement on parallel DISTINCT |