Fwd: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods

From: Abinaya k <abinaya(dot)k(dot)496(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Fwd: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods
Date: 2018-01-23 16:37:49
Message-ID: CAEtC32P1gcmK4SHUHATRsCR9ZV8ynk+ShnKqy7qu3AQ4-MoCdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Abinaya k" <abinaya(dot)k(dot)496(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Jan 23, 2018 1:43 PM
Subject: Regarding ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup index methods
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc:

Hai all,
We are building In-memory index extension for postgres. We would
capture table inserts, updates, deletes using triggers. During vacuum
operation, postgres would give calls to ambulkdelete, amvacuumcleanup (as
part of index cleanup). As we handle all updates, deletes using triggers,
we don't have to do any index cleanup in ambulkdelete. But, what stats
should i return from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup? Is that necessary to
return stats from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-23 16:40:01 Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-23 16:33:56 Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use