Re: TopoSort() fix

From: Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TopoSort() fix
Date: 2019-07-04 03:15:50
Message-ID: CAEri+mKtZkj=+phnkkD9_8sf1fLFUqwHio8Ls4f7JGVgqku6QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I'll try to figure out some scenarios to do the test. A parallel process
group is needed for the test.

Actually I was trying to do some testing against the locking mechanism. I
happened to see this issue.

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 9:38 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:23 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Rui Hai Jiang <ruihaij(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > I think I found an issue in the TopoSort() function.
> >
> > This indeed seems like a live bug introduced by a1c1af2a.
> > Robert?
>
> This is pretty thoroughly swapped out of my head, but it looks like
> that analysis might be correct.
>
> Is it practical to come up with a test case that demonstrates the problem?
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2019-07-04 03:43:31 Re: Tid scan improvements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-04 02:35:21 Re: Where is SSPI auth username determined for TAP tests?