Re: test: avoid redundant standby catchup in 049_wait_for_lsn

From: Jobin Augustine <jobin(dot)augustine(at)percona(dot)com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test: avoid redundant standby catchup in 049_wait_for_lsn
Date: 2026-09-29 11:46:56
Message-ID: CAEpZXfeLrJUS2+5x6AxB2bF+BCusUvQTBgMxrcifURu9FdfwsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Xuneng, hackers,

I ran into the same pg_current_wal_insert_lsn() page-boundary problem
discussed in this thread, independently, outside the regression tests,
while evaluating WAIT FOR for read-your-writes on a standby using a custom
coded application to test the usability of this feature.

At this boundary, pg_current_wal_insert_lsn() returns the next insertion
> address, which is after the header gap. The test thus waited for a position
> beyond the existing WAL, requiring another WAL record to make progress. The
> unrelated progression comes from the primary's background writer who
> generated a RUNNING_XACTS record, advancing WAL to 0/0301A050, and then
> notified the waiters.

About 1 in 2000 waits never succeeded and ran to the full TIMEOUT
Since all my sessions were using WAIT FOR LSN, it was a complete stall,
whenever it happens.

A client side workaround similar to the following is a temporary solution
for me for my tests:
CREATE FUNCTION wal_insert_end_lsn(l pg_lsn DEFAULT
pg_current_wal_insert_lsn())
RETURNS pg_lsn LANGUAGE sql STABLE AS $$
SELECT CASE
WHEN (l - '0/0'::pg_lsn) %
pg_size_bytes(current_setting('wal_segment_size'))
< current_setting('wal_block_size')::int -- first page of a
segment
THEN CASE WHEN (l - '0/0'::pg_lsn) %
current_setting('wal_block_size')::int = 40
THEN l - 40 ELSE l END
ELSE CASE WHEN (l - '0/0'::pg_lsn) %
current_setting('wal_block_size')::int = 24
THEN l - 24 ELSE l END
END
$$;

A server-side fix would be better
Could WAIT FOR itself also tolerate such targets? When the target points
exactly past a page header treat it as the page boundary.

Thanks for tracking this down in the test. It saved me from chasing what
looked like a WAIT FOR wakeup bug.

Thanks and Regards,
Jobin.

--

------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2026-09-29 12:07:24 Re: [PATCH] Two remaining shmem attachment issues in single-user mode
Previous Message Manu 2026-09-29 11:45:06 Re: BUG #19686: Rolling back SET TABLESPACE