| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGDG status and policy |
| Date: | 2018-10-18 22:36:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAEfWYyxOxOknfGzCi8BCMFgF_SNr5gngzptN50DPXDv3KXWvzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
No, the *link* exists. The package doesn't (404 errors on, for example,
Centos 7 x86_64 and several others).
Cheers,
Steve
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:22 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 10/18/18 3:02 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> > While looking to install version 11 I discovered that the PGDG Yum
> > repository page at
> > https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ includes repository
> > RPMs for RHEL7 (x86_64 and ppc64Ie), and RHEL6 (x86_64 and i386).
> >
> > However there are no RPMs for version 6 of any derivatives (CentOS,
> > Scientific, Oracle) and the RPMs for all the RHEL derivatives are for
> > ppc64Ie only.
>
> My guess is the code supplying the dropdowns has not been refreshed.
> Looks like the packages do exist:
>
> https://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php
>
> >
> > To what extent are the missing repos simply due to packagers being busy
> > and which are by policy? I looked for a packaging policy and failed to
> > find one. Does such a thing exist?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Steve
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-10-18 22:58:13 | Re: convert real to numeric. |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-10-18 22:22:56 | Re: PGDG status and policy |