Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Date: 2018-09-19 01:58:36
Message-ID: CAEepm=2YYAtkSnens=TR2S=oRcAF9=2P7GPMK0wMJtxKF1QRig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:24 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a new version.

Bitrot, rebased.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Track-the-next-xid-using-64-bits-v6.patch application/octet-stream 44.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-19 02:32:11 Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-09-19 01:48:06 Re: pread() and pwrite()