| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | LDAPS |
| Date: | 2017-11-03 13:05:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1s+pA-LZUjQ-9GQz0Z4rX_eK=DFXAF1nBQ+ROPimuOYQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers,
I've run into a few requests for $SUBJECT in the field. I understand
that this is a bit controversial: LDAP + StartTLS (what we already
support) is better than LDAPS because it's a proper standard, and LDAP
auth in general is not as good as some other authentication methods
that we should be encouraging. I don't actually have a strong view on
whether we should support it myself, but I took a swing at it to see
if there would be any technical obstacles. I did not find any. That
said, I've only tested the attached lightly on FreeBSD + OpenLDAP and
don't know if it'll work elsewhere. Thoughts?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| ldaps-v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-11-03 13:12:27 | Re: Re: PANIC: invalid index offnum: 186 when processing BRIN indexes in VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-11-03 13:00:15 | Re: parallelize queries containing initplans |