Size vs size_t

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Size vs size_t
Date: 2017-03-16 20:40:17
Message-ID: CAEepm=1eA0vsgA7-2oigKzqg10YeXoPWiS-fCuQRDLwwmgMXag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \<Size\> and
\<size_t\> over time. After a very long run in the lead, size_t has
recently been left in the dust by Size.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
image/png 29.0 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-03-16 20:41:48 Re: GSOC - TOAST'ing in slices
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-03-16 20:23:59 Re: ON CONFLICT with constraint name doesn't work