Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
Date: 2017-08-21 01:18:35
Message-ID: CAEepm=3wk1AiAy=_gobkOVnzCwGdrw1Magq1g76oWCfN+mRuRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I think it'd be a good idea to backpatch the addition of
> TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n) to make future backpatching easier. What do
> others think?

+1

That would also provide a way for extension developers to be able to
write code that compiles against PG11 and also earlier releases
without having to do ugly conditional macros stuff.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-21 01:33:00 Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-21 00:46:43 Re: Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative