Re: UPDATE of partition key

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2017-02-20 10:06:50
Message-ID: CAEepm=3mu7mHui4bz29PAY-VvDu36jjPXfdkNBWYnVoSFDsKNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Generally speaking, we don't throw
> serialization errors today at READ COMMITTED, so if we do so here,
> that's going to be a noticeable and perhaps unwelcome change.

Yes we do:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-02-20 10:08:13 Re: UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2017-02-20 09:36:46 Re: case_preservation_and_insensitivity = on