Re: Optimize Arm64 crc32c implementation in Postgresql

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yuqi Gu <Yuqi(dot)Gu(at)arm(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimize Arm64 crc32c implementation in Postgresql
Date: 2018-05-02 23:20:36
Message-ID: CAEepm=3i1yT+YowKA_Byh5_Yqget93if4pheksUAMaHA1f+6jA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I don't have any way to test this, but it looks plausible, so pushed.
>
> (I note you forgot to run autoheader, btw.)

Thanks!

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2018-05-02 23:38:53 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-05-02 23:06:24 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?