Re: Covering GiST indexes

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Covering GiST indexes
Date: 2018-07-29 09:28:28
Message-ID: CAEepm=33fU9o7YCwtEH2QCYdQRUf0V7R6hsLgHs1X69rr4ykRQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> Here is v3 version of the patch. I've fixed some comments and added some words to docs.

Hi again Andrey,

Cfbot reported the following difference (twice) in the
index_including_gist test:

- ERROR: included columns must not intersect with key columns
+ ERROR: relation "tbl_gist_idx" already exists

Well, both of those errors are valid complaints in this case... maybe
the order of checks changed in master since you wrote the patch?
Probably better to use a different name for the index anyway.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-07-29 10:11:17 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-07-29 09:04:35 Re: GiST VACUUM