Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Date: 2018-03-21 22:36:47
Message-ID: CAEepm=2vGV7-yG0UVjX4Vz2x8-hzn=0c1-eaPba_dH8hNekX1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2018-03-22 10:50:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Hmm. There is no LLVM 6 in backports.
>
> I think there now is:
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=llvm&searchon=names&section=all&suite=stretch-backports
>
> Package llvm-6.0-dev
>
> stretch-backports (devel): Modular compiler and toolchain technologies, libraries and headers
> 1:6.0-1~bpo9+1: amd64
>
> It's a recent addition:
>
> llvm-toolchain-6.0 (1:6.0-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium
>
> * Team upload
> * Rebuild for stretch-backports.
>
> -- Anton Gladky <gladk(at)debian(dot)org> Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:58:43 +0100

Huh, it hasn't made it to my mirror yet.

Anyway, I upgraded and built with LLVM 6 and make check now passes on
my arm64 system. Woohoo!

Via an off-list exchange I learned that Andres suspects a bug in LLVM
3.9 on arm64 and will investigate/maybe file a bug report with LLVM.
Not sure if we'll want to try to actively identify and avoid known
buggy versions or not?

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-21 22:46:57 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2
Previous Message legrand legrand 2018-03-21 22:33:55 pg_stat_statements HLD for futur developments