Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date: 2018-01-23 22:08:53
Message-ID: CAEepm=2oV6ovL3T+9Pqjsnd+D688yx_vtMiwqSkqQzURdom7rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> (3)
>> erm, maybe it's a problem that errors occurring in workers while the
>> leader is waiting at a barrier won't unblock the leader (we don't
>> detach from barriers on abort/exit) -- I'll look into this.
>
> I think if there's an ERROR, the general parallelism machinery is
> going to arrange to kill every worker, so nothing matters in that case
> unless barrier waits ignore interrupts, which I'm pretty sure they
> don't. (Also: if they do, I'll hit the ceiling; that would be awful.)

(After talking this through with Robert off-list). Right, the
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in ConditionVariableSleep() handles errors from
parallel workers. There is no problem here.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-01-23 22:10:27 Re: FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables
Previous Message Jing Wang 2018-01-23 22:00:03 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority