Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data
Date: 2016-03-09 05:39:37
Message-ID: CAEepm=2mrcyB-RGsH5z+Th13R3ow1CY7skxuPKpcw6wTS0LUkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> WAL replay for 2PC should also
> call XLogRequestWalReceiverReply() when needed.

Ah yes, I missed this important sentence. I will address that in the
next version after some testing.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-09 06:15:20 Re: Optimizer questions
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-03-09 05:07:03 Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data