Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> > <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I marked this patch as ready for committer.
> >
> > The patch says:
> >
> > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
> > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>,
> > there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received.
> >
> > But wouldn't it be more correct to say:
> >
> > If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
> > with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the
> > worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way
> > for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications.
>
> Yes, the above description is good.

+1

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com