Re: Measuring replay lag

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Measuring replay lag
Date: 2017-03-23 10:13:58
Message-ID: CAEepm=2BnmDCob8x7SZ+AyHToO8FobcPoAej3YqedopTqr0Prw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Second thoughts... I'll just make LagTrackerWrite externally
>> available, so a plugin can send anything it wants to the tracker.
>> Which means I'm explicitly removing the "logical replication support"
>> from this patch.
>
> Done.
>
> Here's the patch I'm looking to commit, with some docs and minor code
> changes as discussed.

Giving LagTrackerWrite external linkage seems sensible, assuming there
is a reasonable way for logical replication to decide when to call it.

+ system. Monitoring systems should choose whether the represent this
+ as missing data, zero or continue to display the last known value.

s/whether the/whether to/

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2017-03-23 10:14:22 Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Previous Message Vitaly Burovoy 2017-03-23 10:09:32 Re: identity columns