Re: neqjoinsel versus "refresh materialized view concurrently"

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: neqjoinsel versus "refresh materialized view concurrently"
Date: 2018-03-13 22:34:06
Message-ID: CAEepm=1kdvEq-06_w2+VyfxOxy3sbRCq5Rw_MsjEaTjaXTSZOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The following commit has caused a devastating performance regression
> in concurrent refresh of MV:
>
> commit 7ca25b7de6aefa5537e0dbe56541bc41c0464f97
> Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Date: Wed Nov 29 22:00:29 2017 -0500
>
> Fix neqjoinsel's behavior for semi/anti join cases.
>
>
> The below reproduction goes from taking about 1 second to refresh, to taking
> an amount of time I don't have the patience to measure.
>
> drop table foobar2 cascade;
> create table foobar2 as select * from generate_series(1,200000);
> create materialized view foobar3 as select * from foobar2;
> create unique index on foobar3 (generate_series );
> analyze foobar3;
> refresh materialized view CONCURRENTLY foobar3 ;
>
>
> When I interrupt the refresh, I get a message including this line:
>
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "SELECT newdata FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16420 newdata
> WHERE newdata IS NOT NULL AND EXISTS (SELECT * FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16420
> newdata2 WHERE newdata2 IS NOT NULL AND newdata2 OPERATOR(pg_catalog.*=)
> newdata AND newdata2.ctid OPERATOR(pg_catalog.<>) newdata.ctid) LIMIT 1"
>
> So I makes sense that the commit in question could have caused a change in
> the execution plan. Because these are temp tables, I can't easily get my
> hands on them to investigate further.

Ouch. A quadratic join. This looks like an invisible correlation problem.

load 'auto_explain';
set auto_explain.log_min_duration = 0;
set auto_explain.log_analyze = true;

drop table if exists t cascade;

create table t as select generate_series(1, 5000);
create materialized view mv as select * from t;
create unique index on mv(generate_series);
analyze mv;
refresh materialized view concurrently mv;

HEAD:

LOG: duration: 26101.612 ms plan:
Query Text: SELECT newdata FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16452 newdata WHERE
newdata IS NOT NULL AND EXISTS (SELECT * FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16452
newdata2 WHERE newdata2 IS NOT NULL AND newdata2
OPERATOR(pg_catalog.*=) newdata AND newdata2.ctid
OPERATOR(pg_catalog.<>) newdata.ctid) LIMIT 1
Limit (cost=0.00..90.52 rows=1 width=28) (actual
time=26101.608..26101.608 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop Semi Join (cost=0.00..225220.96 rows=2488 width=28)
(actual time=26101.606..26101.606 rows=0 loops=1)
Join Filter: ((newdata2.ctid <> newdata.ctid) AND (newdata.* *=
newdata2.*))
Rows Removed by Join Filter: 25000000
-> Seq Scan on pg_temp_16452 newdata (cost=0.00..73.00
rows=4975 width=34) (actual time=0.022..15.448 rows=5000 loops=1)
Filter: (newdata.* IS NOT NULL)
-> Materialize (cost=0.00..97.88 rows=4975 width=34) (actual
time=0.000..0.500 rows=5000 loops=5000)
-> Seq Scan on pg_temp_16452 newdata2 (cost=0.00..73.00
rows=4975 width=34) (actual time=0.010..4.033 rows=5000 loops=1)
Filter: (newdata2.* IS NOT NULL)

And with commit 7ca25b7de6aefa5537e0dbe56541bc41c0464f97 reverted:

LOG: duration: 36.358 ms plan:
Query Text: SELECT newdata FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16470 newdata WHERE
newdata IS NOT NULL AND EXISTS (SELECT * FROM pg_temp_3.pg_temp_16470
newdata2 WHERE newdata2 IS NOT NULL AND newdata2
OPERATOR(pg_catalog.*=) newdata AND newdata2.ctid
OPERATOR(pg_catalog.<>) newdata.ctid) LIMIT 1
Limit (cost=756.95..939.50 rows=1 width=28) (actual
time=36.354..36.354 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Merge Semi Join (cost=756.95..2947.51 rows=12 width=28) (actual
time=36.352..36.352 rows=0 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (newdata.* *= newdata2.*)
Join Filter: (newdata2.ctid <> newdata.ctid)
Rows Removed by Join Filter: 5000
-> Sort (cost=378.48..390.91 rows=4975 width=34) (actual
time=9.622..10.300 rows=5000 loops=1)
Sort Key: newdata.* USING *<
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 622kB
-> Seq Scan on pg_temp_16470 newdata (cost=0.00..73.00
rows=4975 width=34) (actual time=0.021..4.986 rows=5000 loops=1)
Filter: (newdata.* IS NOT NULL)
-> Sort (cost=378.48..390.91 rows=4975 width=34) (actual
time=7.378..8.010 rows=5000 loops=1)
Sort Key: newdata2.* USING *<
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 622kB
-> Seq Scan on pg_temp_16470 newdata2 (cost=0.00..73.00
rows=4975 width=34) (actual time=0.017..3.034 rows=5000 loops=1)
Filter: (newdata2.* IS NOT NULL)

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2018-03-13 22:36:21 Re: [submit code] I develop a tool for pgsql, how can I submit it
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-13 22:29:33 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v11