Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shawn Debnath <sdn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Date: 2018-11-26 22:46:50
Message-ID: CAEepm=1TDor1xHkYtpqEpuu5kpoU-DbLGX49scCY_zY-t3H-ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 5:45 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I do have a new plan though...

Ugh. The plan in my previous email doesn't work, I was confused about
the timing of the buffer header update. Back to the drawing board.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-11-26 22:50:18 Re: [RFC] Removing "magic" oids
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-26 22:29:17 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists