Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment
Date: 2018-10-01 22:47:48
Message-ID: CAEepm=1QkD_udoP3sxc_fci7x3PXQu3-Q-E-oempRuciSNp05Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Apparently the only somewhat-modern architecture that is resolutely
> unaligned-unfriendly is MIPS.

It's been a few years now since I worked on that architecture, but
Sparc is somewhat-modern and resolutely unaligned-unfriendly. It's
just that you can optionally install a trap handler that will do super
slow non-atomic misaligned access in software instead of blowing up
with SIGBUS. With the Sun toolchain you did that explicitly by
building with -misalign (though it's possible that more recent
compilers might be doing that without being asked?).

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-10-01 23:09:15 snprintf.c hammering memset()
Previous Message Lou Picciano 2018-10-01 22:30:28 Re: SerializeParamList vs machines with strict alignment