Re: pread() and pwrite()

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tobias Oberstein <tobias(dot)oberstein(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pread() and pwrite()
Date: 2018-10-09 02:27:48
Message-ID: CAEepm=1FDQOTtpSDP+VX15t1F+cg1jOHKNs-NNM=qFYYk_0++w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Rebased again. Patches that touch AC_CHECK_FUNCS are fun like that!
>
> Yeah, I've been burnt by that too recently. It occurs to me we could make
> that at least a little less painful if we formatted the macro with one
> line per function name:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([
> cbrt
> clock_gettime
> fdatasync
> ...
> wcstombs_l
> ])
>
> You'd still get conflicts in configure itself, of course, but that
> doesn't require manual work to resolve -- just re-run autoconf.

+1, was about to suggest the same!

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-10-09 02:39:39 Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-09 02:26:42 Re: Function for listing archive_status directory