| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2 |
| Date: | 2018-03-21 21:50:52 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=11X-9xyPAt6BHCKR2n9TGZ0C=kL8DFdE3+xdtf-GoV+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2018-03-21 23:10:27 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Next up, I have an arm64 system running Debian 9.4. It bombs in
>> "make check" and in simple tests:
>
> Any chance you could try w/ LLVM 6? It looks like some parts of ORC
> only got aarch64 in LLVM 6. I didn't *think* those were necessary, but
> given the backtrace it looks like that still might be relevant.
Hmm. There is no LLVM 6 in backports. I'll have to build it, which
I'm happy to do if I can wrap my brain around its cmake build system
(or for you to build it if you want), but it may take... who knows, a
day? on this little thing.
If that turns out to be it I guess we'd need to figure out how to
detect an LLVM with bits missing hand handle it more gracefully?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-03-21 21:53:08 | Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12.2 |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-03-21 21:48:35 | Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null |