| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Measuring replay lag |
| Date: | 2017-01-04 11:10:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=10kGC15gVz0xd=EQF3EGf6+ymD57byi2DDTv4GvAEj6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> So perhaps I should get rid of that replication_lag_sample_interval
> GUC and send back apply timestamps frequently, as you were saying. It
> would add up to a third more replies.
Oops, of course I meant to say up to 50% more replies...
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-01-04 11:13:38 | Re: Microvacuum support for Hash Index |
| Previous Message | Artur Zakirov | 2017-01-04 11:06:44 | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription |