Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed
Date: 2018-01-12 01:35:37
Message-ID: CAEepm=0e59DXJsxTibBtY3H5rJGR_7sd_31xP8NJo0cw1rJMOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am sending updated patch with some basic doc

Hi Pavel,

I am not sure what the status of this patch is, but FYI:

startup.c: In function ‘main’:
startup.c:284:3: error: too few arguments to function ‘listAllDbs’
success = listAllDbs(NULL, false);
^
In file included from startup.c:21:0:
describe.h:68:13: note: declared here
extern bool listAllDbs(const char *pattern, bool verbose, sortby_type
sortby, bool sort_desc);
^

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-01-12 01:41:06 Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Luke Cowell 2018-01-12 01:26:52 Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number of relations