Re: UPDATE of partition key

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2017-11-08 05:33:09
Message-ID: CAEepm=0WVQjcEVN3tirEcTeiHb2E3CWGbstPcOr65iLHtVgviw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thomas, can you please try the attached incremental patch
> regress_locale_changes.patch and check if the test passes ? The patch
> is to be applied on the main v22 patch. If the test passes, I will
> include these changes (also for list_parted) in the upcoming v23
> patch.

That looks good. Thanks.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2017-11-08 05:49:47 Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-11-08 05:23:18 Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: path toward faster partition pruning