From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14973: hung queries |
Date: | 2017-12-18 19:55:39 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=0P9h4_fG1A5uWDiMh+q8crO+0u5fmOpWeqEUHz8NqPpQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:31 AM, <skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> pg_stat_activity says that they all have wait_event_type = IPC, wait_event =
>> BtreePage, state = active
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1ePESn-0005PV-S9%40gemulon.postgresql.org
>
> The problem is in Parallel Index Scan for btree. The fix will be in
> 10.2. One workaround in the meantime would be to disable parallelism
> for that query (SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0).
On second thoughts, a more targeted workaround to avoid just these
buggy parallel index scans without disabling parallelism in general
might be:
SET min_parallel_index_scan_size = '5TB';
(Assuming you don't have any indexes that large.)
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitry Shalashov | 2017-12-18 21:18:49 | Re: BUG #14973: hung queries |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-12-18 17:38:09 | Re: BUG #14973: hung queries |