From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Obsolete use of volatile in walsender.c, walreceiver.c, walreceiverfuncs.c? |
Date: | 2015-10-16 00:07:48 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=0-FFs06HNmVpbt=UxTUbi=cjSw0X4oKmr9_Rw-zUWO=g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Right, see attached.
>>
>> It seems to me that we could as well simplify checkpoint.c and
>> logical.c. In those files volatile casts are used as well to protect
>> from reordering for spinlock operations. See for example 0002 on top
>> of 0001 that is Thomas' patch.
>
> These patches look good to me, so I have committed them.
Thanks. Also, spin.h's comment contains an out of date warning about
this. Here's a suggested fix for that, and a couple more volatrivia
patches.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
spin-header-comment.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.2 KB |
strip-volatile-hash.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.8 KB |
strip-volatile-ipc.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Noah Misch | 2015-10-16 00:23:49 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-10-16 00:03:49 | Re: Fix unclear comments in tablecmds.c |