Re: COPY command with RLS bug

From: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY command with RLS bug
Date: 2016-09-09 18:55:19
Message-ID: CAE_9P=gBxY5trCJxQnZ-fOrF4t4pOuAVWpjRM7ECZenX2r_OJQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thanks for the report and the fix.

Yup. I have added it to the 2016-11 commitfest:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/11/794/

> This seems a rather basic error to occur a year after release.
>
> Is this a problem with the testing of RLS? What other RLS related
> failures exist in other commands?

I think was simply due to a small gap in the test suite.

> Perhaps we should extend rowsecurity test with a more comprehensive
> set of tests rather than just fix the COPY one?

I think more tests that provide value are always a *good* thing,
however, would argue that other tests 'unrelated' to this fix are more
of a TODO item than something to include with this fix. Though, I am
certainly willing to attempt to find/add more test cases around this
specific functionality if that is desired.

-Adam

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-09 18:57:54 Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Previous Message Greg Stark 2016-09-09 18:40:59 Re: GiST penalty functions [PoC]