Re: Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink

From: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
Date: 2012-11-15 05:33:21
Message-ID: CAEZqfEd+zEeow11JH2cSy-GFNk4F_z5frh9TScVO2a-hUmYyJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry for long absence.

On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> IIRC, the reason why postgresql_fdw instead of pgsql_fdw was
> no other fdw module has shorten naming such as ora_fdw for
> Oracle.
> However, I doubt whether it is enough strong reason to force to
> solve the technical difficulty; naming conflicts with existing user
> visible features.
> Isn't it worth to consider to back to the pgsql_fdw_validator
> naming again?

AFAIR, in the discussion about naming of the new FDW, another
name postgres_fdw was suggested as well as postgresql_fdw, and I
chose the one more familiar to me at that time. I think that only few
people feel that "postgres" is shortened name of
postgresql.

How about using postgres_fdw for PG-FDW?

Regards,
--
Shigeru HANADA

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-11-15 06:17:10 add -Wlogical-op to standard compiler options?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-11-15 05:08:37 Re: [PATCH] Patch to compute Max LSN of Data Pages