Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "v(at)viktorh(dot)net" <v(at)viktorh(dot)net>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)
Date: 2025-11-17 11:36:17
Message-ID: CAEZATCXmsStsRUTxEiKQ43mpEUsLXHs6EQcoCLgG4WEXcx6kJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 at 10:00, v(at)viktorh(dot)net <v(at)viktorh(dot)net> wrote:
>
> One question - why break out the OnConflictSet/ActionState rename to a separate commit? Previously, it only did Set (in update) so it’s naming did make sense.
>

I know that some committers tend to prefer smaller commits than me,
but FWIW, I wouldn't bother splitting out something like this, since
it doesn't really provide any benefit by itself, or really make much
sense without the rest of the patch.

P.S. The convention on these mailing lists is to not top-post, but
instead reply in-line and trim, like this.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-11-17 11:53:27 Fix a couple of misspellings in comments of logic replication
Previous Message Holger Hoffstätte 2025-11-17 11:31:21 Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21