| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 Partitioned tables and relation_is_updatable() |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 17:29:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCWunw3MxLBRN3o3jnGzyBKrWNP0_DC0zpCen27LrLdTYg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 June 2017 at 05:50, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Barring objections, I'll push my original patch and work up patches
>> for the other couple of issues I found.
>
> No objections, the patch is good to go as is. Sorry for high-jacking
> this thread.
>
Thanks for the review. Patch pushed.
Here are patches for the other 2 issues, with test cases showing how
they currently fail on HEAD.
Regards,
Dean
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| teach-RemoveRoleFromObjectPolicy-about-partitioned-tables.patch | text/x-patch | 2.5 KB |
| teach-plpgsql-about-partitioned-tables.patch | text/x-patch | 4.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-06-13 17:43:29 | Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2017-06-13 17:26:58 | Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption |