Re: Greatest Common Divisor

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date: 2020-01-20 07:44:52
Message-ID: CAEZATCWU+heV6ScwLDco33jiBkHZsZWkRVNGR5OeQPU+zpxawA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
>
> Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
> is an int not a smallint.
>

I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it, and barring objections,
I'll start by ripping out the smallint code.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-01-20 07:46:50 Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process
Previous Message david.turon 2020-01-20 07:39:35 Re: empty range