On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
>
> Doubt it. It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
> is an int not a smallint.
>
I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it, and barring objections,
I'll start by ripping out the smallint code.
Regards,
Dean