Re: Fix replica identity checks for MERGE command on published table.

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fix replica identity checks for MERGE command on published table.
Date: 2025-09-04 11:07:10
Message-ID: CAEZATCWPThUd-CmFDWAWBtaE9KR55ExA5itgCxh=gFt1ztXw_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 07:17, Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review. Since we agreed to back-patch both fixes, I am attaching
> The patches for all branches (added a new function as suggested in back branches).

Thanks.

I've pushed these, though I swapped the order of commit, and of the
arguments for CheckValidResultRel() because INSERT ON CONFLICT DO
UPDATE is older than MERGE, so it seemed more natural to put that
first.

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-09-04 11:10:40 Re: Generate GUC tables from .dat file
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2025-09-04 11:05:50 Re: Use merge-based matching for MCVs in eqjoinsel