Re: factorial of negative numbers

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: factorial of negative numbers
Date: 2020-06-16 09:49:59
Message-ID: CAEZATCVyX+QtVMLKrktwrbtbRRR70n6-Bt5QXh+g8fiGE9n3hQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 10:09, Juan José Santamaría Flecha
<juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It is defined as NaN (or undefined), which is not in the realm of integer numbers. You might get a clear idea of the logic from [1], where they also make a case for the error being ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO.
>
> [1] http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60851.html
>

Hmm, I think ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO should probably be reserved for
actual division functions.

With [1], we could return 'Infinity', which would be more correct from
a mathematical point of view, and might be preferable to erroring-out
in some contexts.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/606717.1591924582%40sss.pgh.pa.us

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-06-16 09:51:43 Re: Parallel copy
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2020-06-16 09:34:38 Re: factorial of negative numbers