Re: Bug in MERGE's test for tables with rules

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in MERGE's test for tables with rules
Date: 2022-11-25 13:39:59
Message-ID: CAEZATCVso98Fp=JhW22iw+5zXP008y7YbaoakNhC3mCcrrEMNw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 15:32, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Not quite sure the added test case is worth the cycles.
>

No, probably not, for such a trivial change.

Pushed to HEAD and 15, without the test. Thanks for looking!

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-11-25 15:10:43 Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Previous Message Richard Guo 2022-11-25 12:46:11 Re: Bug in row_number() optimization