Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
Date: 2025-07-09 21:31:56
Message-ID: CAEZATCVN=v3yo2snzhc4Y=v=pe4YiJHR6QVDhsJY7_hGy60vjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 18:27, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> I think we should wire this up to the buildsystem and our testsuite... Having
> testcode that is not run automatically may be helpful while originally
> developing something, but it doesn't do anything to detect portability issues
> or regressions.

Yes, perhaps we should convert src/tools/testint128.c into a new test
extension, src/test/modules/test_int128

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-07-09 21:39:48 Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2025-07-09 21:21:59 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data