Re: BF failure: could not open relation with OID XXXX while querying pg_views

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BF failure: could not open relation with OID XXXX while querying pg_views
Date: 2019-09-15 10:27:19
Message-ID: CAEZATCVG-dPeairg5HuObHXK3dFbWhZso76AJEiK820NAkb+jQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 11:11, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 10:16:30AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >
> >Ah sorry, I missed this thread before. As author of that commit, it's
> >really on me to fix it, and the cause seems pretty clear-cut, so I'll
> >aim to get that done today.
>
> FWIW here is a draft patch that I was going to propose - it simply moves
> the table+view into a "tststats" schema. I suppose that's rougly what we
> discussed earlier in this thread.
>

Yes, that matches what I just drafted.
Do you want to push it, or shall I?

Regards,
Dean

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2019-09-15 10:47:15 Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2019-09-15 10:21:05 Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of NOTIFY over many databases (v2)