On Fri, 18 Sept 2026, 12:03 Dean Rasheed, <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> That fix looks good to me. Nice and simple.
>
Actually, the last part of the new comment is wrong/unnecessary. If it
changes matched from true to false, retrying, it will have locked the
target tuple, and it can't be concurrently deleted when it retries. It
never retries more than once. So the comment can be simplified a bit.
Regards,
Dean
>